|
OnlineVolumes
1, Elements of Reason.
-with foreword for all volumes
1A. Pattern Based Reason
- striving for objectivity, etc
1B. Math Curriculum
Notes
inductive principles etc
2. Three Skills for
Algebra
- unifying themes + study skills
3. Why
Slopes & More Math - previews & starter lessons for
elementary & advanced calculus.
See Volume 2 and 3 if you are preparing kids for calculus.
More Site Areas
1. Help Your Child or Teen
Learn.
2. Linear Equations
& Fraction Skills - Sec I to V level
3. Fractions Ratios
Rates Proportions Units - Sec I & II
4. Euclidean
Geometry - Sec IV
5. Analytic Geometry -Sec
IV & V
6. Number Theory. Sec V
&VI
7. More Calculus Sec V
& VI
8. Complex Numbers Sec
II to VI
9. Qc Maths Education
10. Secondary IV(?) math
11.Real
Analysis College level
12. LaTeX2HotEqn College level
13. Electric Circuits Etc
Sec IV+
14 Français - Sec III +
15. www.whyslopes.com Entrance
Level Pages:
This Calculus
Preview and Chapters 2 to 6 in Volume 3 offer lessons to make
the hard easier at the start of calculus, or to provide a context for the study
of slopes and factored polynomials before calculus.
Your IP
Address &
how to use it
Three Links for Teachers:
(i) First
Year High School Math - Lesson Plans with Fraction Focus
(ii) Second
Year High School Math - Lesson Plans with an algebra focus
(iii) Algebra Lesson
Plans
Parents: Site Area Helping
Your Child or Teen Learn covers 1.
Speaking Skills, 2.
Reading & Writing, 3.
Preparing for Science, 4.
Math Work Books, 5.Books
for Parents, 6.
Mathematics for ages 6 to 14, 7.
Having Patience -you'll need it. Chaperone your sons and
daughters through jumpMath
workbooks for grades 3 to 8 along side site lessons for grades 7 to college and
material elsewhere. Parents and teachers need to say no for small things of
little consequence to build and maintain authority to say no for larger matters.
Parental authority: use it or lose it, but do not abuse it.
Lesson Plans and lessons
Secondary I - fractions
& allied concepts (decimals, percentages)
Secondary II - Algebra (arithmetic versus algebraic methods, backward
use of formulas and proportionality equations)
Secondary III - to come(?)
Secondary IV - Functions to Trig & Statistics
Algebra Lesson Notes & Ideas for All levels
| |
Still More on Mathematics Education, Etc.
For a Leaner Curriculum
Where mathematics education reform is too bureaucratic or too
rigid to consider ideas that should count, more generations of students will
suffer from gaps in course design at the secondary & college level.
Education reform has led to more and more
topics being included in secondary school mathematics. while old shortcomings
linger and new ones born. A lean mathematics curriculum would focus on
fraction and algebra skills and sense, 2D geometry with and without
coordinates, trigonometric, and logic, all as preparation for calculus. A lean
mathematics curriculum might include some application to demonstrate the
usefulness of fractions, algebra and coordinates, and so invite the further
studies. Preparation for calculus is key to college or university the
thought-based as distinct from rote, study and comprehension of
accounting, science and mathematics. In secondary school mathematics,
statistics, 3d geometry, nets for 3D polyhedra, and transformation geometry
are digressions for learning outside of mathematics, in say courses on
social science, art or technical drawing, if need-be. Including these
digression in core mathematics programs dilutes the preparation for calculus
and calculus-based studies in mathematics Inclusions leads to a loss of focus
in skill and knowledge development. Lean mathematics instruction could
and should focus on mastery of fractions, algebra, 2d geometry with and
without coordinates, logic, and trig.
Cut, cut, cut. Do the minimum well. Then enrich once the minimum
is well-taught. Further cuts or shortening are possible by dropping artifacts in
course design and delivery, topics not required for further skill and concept
development. That being said, teachers still have to cover topics demanded
by local school authorities. Site remedies may be woven into lessons to support
and enrich local curricula, lean or not.
Education, An Empirical Art
In empirical arts, practices with repeatable and
reproducible results come first, tested via trial and error, while theories
and principles come later to summarize, to codify, to refine and even
enlighten the practices. While practices or sequences of them in some
empirical or hands-on arts in science, technology and business, assembly lines
included, may comply with principles and standards, even be connected
and organized and designed around said principles and standards, the
forerunner to such organization consists of experience where principles and
standards in formation and adaptation met reality - success and failure
included.
Education is an empirical art. We may not read a student's mind,
how a student thinks or links together skills and patterns, yet we can
observe and test student performance, skill by skill, concept by concept, and
encourage, but not guarantee, mastery of standard calculations and standard
arguments or chains of reason in algebra, geometry and beyond. In some
disciplines, not all, there are right and wrong answers due to methods that lead
to repeatable and reproducible, and thus verifiable results independent of
whom-ever applies the method. Learning how to apply and combine methods
carefully to obtain reproducible and thus verifiable results is an old sign of
intelligence in many old arts and disciplines in business, trades, science,
engineering, technology and bureaucracy. The latter is subject to the
limitations of rule and pattern based thought and practices, and the critical
knowledge that not all is certain in empirical based thought and practice.
Critical thinking in science and technology begins with an
awareness that what we hope for, dream of or construct in our minds remains
speculation or faith IF or WHILE it or its consequence cannot be observe or
tested directly, and thus corroborated if not confirmed. The foregoing is a
rebuttal to the constructivist theory of learning, the part which opposes
testing, the existence of questions with right or wrong answers, and which says
student knowledge, if individually constructed, should not be
contradicted. Empirically sound education must oppose wishful thinking.
That being said, constructivist methods for engaging, authentic, genuine
material and the development of critical thinking could be incorporated into
education as an empirical art.
More on Testing. Knowledge empirically
found or tested is relative and not absolute. Instruction which relies on
testing skills and concepts can only identify errors in the mastery of the
latter while correct responses only confirm, but do not guarantee mastery. But
the level of student competence in a discipline defined by skills and concept
mastery can be estimated from the degree of difficulty, the unlikelihood of
correct responses if skills and concepts have not been mastered, and
comprehensive of a test or series of test. Here individualized testing may be
informative that mass testing. Empirical soundness of instruction and testing,
the issue of lessons and associated tests with repeatable and
reproducible results locally and beyond, should not be scrutinized in an
absolute manner. Cognitive theory should look at education as an
empirical art.
Constructivism versus Empirical Methods
|
After all is said, I found myself
advocating an empirical approach to course design and delivery, an
approach which may be combined with constructivist educational methods,
those that work regardless of flaws in empirically unsound
constructivist principles or theories, - principles and theories
which imply subjectivity in mathematics and science, and beyond, which
emphasize the empirical weakness of testing in education, if not in
general, in place of the empirical merits. Constructivism with its
advocacy of critical thinking in criticizing testing is contradicting the
empirical basis of science and technology, the readiness to test in order
to eliminate errors and so favor some success.
Managing or directing mathematics
course design and delivery by insisting that pedagogical methods will
work is a top-down approach to education reform. In the absence of
testing, of clearly explicitly defined steps or building blocks
which have worked, this top-down approach becomes an
empirical gamble, like marketing and distributing a drug blindly
in the hope that it work well and have no side effects. Besides
hope in education reform, there needs to be verification - trust but
verify. Otherwise, great leap forwards may do more harm than good.
While we cannot read a student mind to see
what has been constructer or understood or not, or how, we can in
good empirical form observe, correct and mark what is written or
produced by students. Continuous testing, probing and observation of
student performance is part of a continuous educational process.
Through test feedback and/or direct explanations, students learn to
avoid or discount wishful suppositions or constructs in contradiction with
their environment in and out of school. Thus schooling can shape
students minds rigidly. Or, schools can present rules and patterns
of various arts and disciplines, and indicate the origins, benefits and
limitations of rule and pattern based knowledge, the presence of
uncertainty, the open ended nature of many situations or problems, a
necessary disappointment for those of us nostalgic for certainty.
Spelling in a language requires knowledge
of all the letters in its alphabet. We would oppose suggestions that
students have to learn only part of alphabet. Some spellings are
artificial. Students have to be given them. Students cannot discover
them. Likewise in mathematics, we should oppose suggestions that
students don't need fraction skills and sense, the prerequisite to
algebra, or suggestions that pencils and paper calculation skills
are not needed because of calculators and technology, or suggestions
that students can discover mathematics by themselves. The structure of
mathematics is inherited, handed-down and varying over time. Insistence
on the discovery methods, insistence on cognitive dissonance, in
learning mathematics leads to a loss of clarity and compounds existing
confusions.
Putting constructivism subjective views of
knowledge in charge of mathematics and science education is akin to
rejecting the form of critical thinking in mathematics and science
developed since the 14th century A.D. The placement invites cognitive
dissonance (confusion) for all involved - students, teachers and
parents. Bon Appetite. |
| |
1B, Mathematics Curriculum Notes,
Chapters 1 to 12
Book Entrance Inductive Principles Three Remarks 1 Introduction 2 For & Against Math 3 Algebraic Thought 4 Why Slopes & SQRT of -1 5 Books & Articles to Read 6 Unruly Origins of Algebra 6. Axiomatic Civilization 7 Geometry, 2 Ways 8 Modern Instruction 9 The Two Ends 10 The Transition 10 Explaining Logic 10 Explaining Algebra 10 Why Sets in Math. 12 Four Phases Essay January 2007 Words for Teachers Grouping Students Site Eurekas Links Managing Reform Constructivism Revisite Math Ed. Professors More On Constructivism Educational Follies Missing the Point I Direct Instruction Damage Reversal
Chapter 11: Primary School Mathematics
11 Primary Math 11 Cue Cards 11 Counting 11 Decimals - Addition 11 Decimals -Times 11 Decimals & Subtraction 11 Fractions and Division 11 Notational Conflict 11 Reciprocals Etc 11 Decimals - Ratios 11 Size Comparison 11 Numbers, +ve or -ve 11 Rename < Sign 11 Complex Numbers
-Inductive
principles for course design & delivery require a clear
description of where and how skills and concepts may rest on earlier ones, so
that difficulties may be explained and remedied by looking for what was
missed or forgotten in earlier studies.
Mathematics is a demanding subject. All errors in notation and
comprehension need to be identified and corrected. In
reading, spelling and writing, students have to learn all the letters in the
alphabet, not just some. and memorize spelling. Anything less implies
difficulty.
Likewise in mathematics, students have to master key skills
and concepts, one at a time and one after another. Anything less implies
difficulty.
Teachers U are not alone. For online help and advice for
understanding and developing mathematics,, contact site author
Professor Selby via (i) Email
(ii) Yaho
(or MSN) Messenger, or (iii) Skype |
|
for online sessions by chance when I am
online or appointment when I am off. The first session (saying hello) is
free. While talking online, we may scribble on Yahoo, MSN,
Skype or
whiteboards. The twiddla whiteboards has a built-in browser for students,
teachers and tutors in general to import webpages and explore/scribble on
them together. It also has audio in theory. [Session
length depends on supply and demand. Call during off-peak periods
for better service. ] |
|