|
|
// _ _ \\
/\ /\
<| (o) (o) |>
\ | | /
|
Have your gifted students read logic
chapters 1 to 5 in online volume Three
Skills for Algebra for greater skills & confidence
in work
and study.
tell students to read notes and textbooks like a lawyer, so that no nuance, no
subtlety and no clause escapes their attention. |
-/[]\-
||
/ \_
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Logic
chapters 1 to 5 re- appear not in sequence, as is or longer,
in Volume 1A, Pattern Based
Reason, Bon Appetite.
Logic
Mastery
Amazing, Amusing, Amorous, Delicious, Delightful, Edifying,
Strengthening Elixir.
It eases work & learning difficulties Makes the hard easier. Opens eyes.
Leads to greater precision.
in reading and
writing
Tell students that Logic
mastery makes the hard, easier. Logic
mastery leads to better, stronger and richer comprehension. Logic
mastery improves reading and writing. Logic
mastery ease learning difficulties. Logic
mastery gives a headstart. In sum, logic
mastery will develops critical thinking, improve reading and writing,
and give a firmer base for work and studies at many levels. Good luck.
After logic,
(a) continue reading Three
Skills for Algebra, chapters 8 to 14 and do so alongside site area on solving
liinear Equations ; or (b) see this calculus
starter lesson and Volume 3, Why
Slopes & More Math, chapters 2 to 6. In Volume 2, Three
Skills for Algebra, a 4th skill for algebra appears in Chapter 14. It
provides a unifying theme for high school mathematics - equations and formulas
may be used forwards and backwards, directly and indirectly, numerically in arithmetic
solutions & with literals in algebraic solutions.
|
// _ _ \\
/\ /\
<| (o) (o) |>
| |
| |
\
/
\ = /
|
Caution: Site advice is approximately
correct, for some circumstances, not all. That leaves room for thought |
-/[]\-
||
_ / \
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What may be learnt and when depends on how skills
and concepts are developed. Making the hard easier and clearer will allow
earlier & richer development of skills and concepts.
Try the Twiddla
Whiteboard. In principle, it allows
to people to draw and chat together online on a copy of this webpage or a clean
sheet. The chat may be via text or audio. Visit www.twiddla.com
to set up whiteboards to work with the webpage of your choice.
For online automated help in senior high school maths & calculus,
visit quickmath.com For Automatic
Calculus and Algebra Help with derivatives, integrals, graphs, linear equations,
matrix algebra, visit calc101.com
With overlap, each site quickmath
& calc101offers a different range of
services, some free, some not, all based on webmathematica. Good luck.
| |
Chapter 12
Four Phases
Education in mathematics and its logic or its rule and pattern based reason
may be divided into four overlapping phases:
- Elementary introduction: Pre-algebraic and pre-deductive with rule
and pattern-based methods.
- Starting the Transition: Algebraic and deductive thought
introduced with more examples of rule and pattern based methods.
- Continuing the Transition: Algebraic and deductive thought
illustrated in many more examples or strands of reason.
- Algebraic Codification: Algebraic and deductive derivation of
mathematical knowledge from basic set theory axioms or more simply from
assumptions about real numbers.
The aim of the first three phases is to broaden the common knowledge of math
and logic. Here the curricula can take a path through easily described, repeated
and mastered ideas. Ease of exposition and perhaps preparation for the fourth
phase will be the guide. These phases are offered in support of an inductive
philosophy for the communication of skills.
Elementary Instruction
The first phase is computational and rule-based. It ideally provides students
with a mastery of arithmetic, counting and the use of simple formulas. It also
provides them with the ability to recognize geometric shapes, employ or measure
signed coordinates on a line and in the plane and employ or measure polar
coordinates as well. The approach is inductive. The attention of students is
drawn repeatedly to rules and patterns in many examples and situations.
Computational and measurement skills are based on the mastery of methods with
repeatable and reproducible results, exact or approximate. Mastery of such rules
provides verifiable results and thus builds confidence – a secure knowledge of
elementary mathematics.
Students may further learn about the approximation of linear measurements
(temperature, distance, weight or masses) with decimal fractions, and the
uncertainty in the last terms of an expansion (significant digits). They may
also learn about infinite decimal expansion, repeating or not. Discussion of the
latter provides a first sense of convergence. Numbers in the first instance are
represented by finite or infinite decimal expansions. In this, discussion of the
decimal number system provides the common thought-based understanding of this
decimal representation. Powers of ten and their reciprocals can be introduced.
The foregoing defines or introduces decimal notation for whole numbers, the
denominators and numerators of fractions, and for decimal fractions.
The better and better approximation of the areas of regions by covering them
with smaller and then smaller squares or rectangles, can be offered as a way to
compute the areas. This covering process and the idea of a limiting value, the
area, to provide a taste of calculus, albeit both students and teachers need not
be aware that it is such a taste. Area estimation can be simply be presented as
a measurement technique. From a technical perspective, it suggests to students
that each region in the plane has an area, and this is the way to compute it.
The thought that saying how to compute a quantity defines it can be expressed
during this exposition of area estimation.
Simple formulas can be introduced for the calculation of perimeters, areas
and volumes of planar or solid bodies and surfaces. Formulas can also be given
for interest computations, simple or compound. Letters may appear here as
shorthand for quantities that may be given, measured or computed. Calculations
will involve units. The formulas may involve multiplication, addition and powers
of both numbers and quantities.
Again, the first phase of mathematics is hands-on (manipulative). Both
students and teachers may understand the applications and see how the repeatable
and reproducible nature of arithmetic methods leads to verifiable results[1].
Set theoretic concepts (membership, union, intersection and complement) can
be introduced here as well without too much emphasis on notation. Algebraic or
symbolic shorthand has another role in the description of membership, inclusion,
unions, intersections and complements.
The first phase is inductive – based on the recognition or identification
of patterns to follow or watch for. The first phase provides students with a
mastery of counting, arithmetic methods, and the use of simple formulas with or
without units of measurement or quantity. Use of formulas begins the
introduction of an algebraic skills – the symbolic description of calculations
that might be done.
Starting the Transition
At the start of the second phase, students may expect to be given formulas or
computational methods and data (number or quantities) to employ with them.
Methods with repeatable, reproducible and therefore verifiable results,
independent of whom obtains them, apart from approximations, are reassuring and
confidence building. The confidence and secure knowledge thus attained can be
retained and reinforced.
Cultivating Algebraic and Reasoning Skills
Once students have mastered counting, arithmetic and the use of simple
formulas, they can be introduced (a) to the algebraic way of writing and
thinking, and (b) to deductive logic. The average ages at which students are
able to master the elements of (a) and (b), respectively, remain to be
determined. But (a) and (b) together provide a foundation for the comprehension
of the deductive exposition of mathematics.
The logic chapters common to the books Pattern Based Reason and Three
Skills for Algebra introduce the main elements of deductive, that is, rule
and pattern-based thought, with examples that are math-free. These examples can
be gradually understood by most students from the ages of 11 to 16 say. They can
be employed in any subject in which chains of reason or deductive thought is
important.
The introduction of the algebraic way of writing and reasoning, based on the
presentation and illustration of the three skills, was discussed in earlier
chapters. The algebraic or symbolic way of writing and thinking is to be
introduced and illustrated before and not while the arithmetic properties of
real numbers etc are described in an algebraic fashion.
Arithmetic properties (axioms) indicate or say when two different
calculations or formulas yield the same result. Deductive algebraic reasoning is
based on the replacement of such formulas (descriptions of calculations) by one
another or by a shorthand symbol that represents their common value or result.
Continuing the Transition
A purely deductive approach would not use the arithmetic methods met in
primary school without deriving them from first principles or axioms. Of course,
that derivation is too complicated for secondary school students, and should be
reserved to math students in college – those interested in the full story. The
immediate justification, via long chains of reasons, for operations already
mastered may be of little immediate interest to secondary school students. The
operations in question work – they give repeatable and reproducible results.
The operations of decimal arithmetic fall in this category – justified,
introduced or explained via examples and description in primary school. So they
are not justified again in high school nor college courses. The justification of
decimal arithmetic (based on mathematical induction) is a forgotten subject, of
little interest today. The justification however of arithmetic operations could
be an illustration of algebraic and deductive thought, and it would give
experience with polynomial like manipulations of expansions in powers of 10 or
some other base. It would further reinforce the command of arithmetic. _But
the omission of any justification represents the first departure from the ideal
of deriving conclusions from axioms in math classes. This is a precedent. And in
view of it, other departures may be tolerated.
Secondary school mathematics after the second phase can be devoted to
illustrating chains of algebraic and deductive thought in ways easily
understood and repeatable by both students and teachers, especially teachers
seconded from other subjects to present mathematics. Solutions of math problems
consists of one or more chains of reasoning based on formal deduction, the
drawing of diagrams and computation. The proof of a statement or theorem
represents another chain of reason. The objective of the higher level math in
secondary school can be limited to demonstrating to students how to follow or
create chains of reasons, and thus justify a conclusion. The conclusion can be a
numerical result or the correctness of a proposition. Cultivating in many the
ability to follow chains of reason, here deductive thought, is more than
important in the first instance than presenting a strict and rigorous
perspective accessible only to the few. The few can see and study the more
rigorous approach later[2].
Examples
The justification of previously mastered operations is not enough – many
students may lose interest and the concern for it may appear to be legalistic.
Deductive chains of reason should be employed in the derivation and
justification of operations not previously met. The issue then is to show the
value of long chains of reason through new examples, not old, albeit some
students will be curious. They can be offered an enriched program, or be
informed that later courses should satisfy their curiosity. Examples to explore
follow.
- In algebra, the exploration and justification of money computations
(growth, geometric sums, mortgage and annuity computations – present or
future value, finite math, combinatorics & probability computations) may
provide further examples of practical chains of reason. The justification of
some formulas, summation formulas for geometric and arithmetic sums for
example, is based here on mathematical induction.
- Nonanalytic/synthetic geometry in the plane and/or the theory of linear
algebra (as distinct from the mastery of matrix computations) provide bodies
(islands) of rule and pattern based thought, each connected internally by
long and short paths or chains of one and two-way implication rules.
- A preview of calculus, a discussion of why slopes, offers an informal and
very physical chains of reason. This preview may be accompanied by an
indication that the chains of reason are not strictly acceptable in pure
mathematics or that physical arguments, while suggestive, are not reliable
enough for use in pure mathematics. The preview offered here can provide
motivation for the study of slopes in algebra courses.
- Trigonometry is required by students wishing to retain the option of
studying science, engineering or mathematics. And if its exposition is made
simple enough [3], students heading in other
directions may master some trigonometry as well. The complex number chapters
in the companion book Why Slopes and More Math (or the earlier
discussion) show or indicate how to add and multiply points or arrows in the
plane, and thus introduce or define the complex numbers. The trigonometric
derivation of formulas for real and imaginary parts of a product, in terms
of those of the factors, gives an application of the cosine and sine
addition formulas. But the multiplication idea of adding angles or rotating
is also present in one unit circle triangle-rotation proof of these addition
formulas. So after the introduction of the complex numbers via the addition
and multiplication of points or arrows in the plane, the triangle rotation
proof of the cosine addition formula can be given. A prior knowledge of the
multiplication rule add the angles, multiplying the lengths makes the
triangle rotation proof less unexpected. The combined explanation of
trigonometry and complex numbers provides another example of a chain or
chains of reason in mathematics.
Remark.The definition of
trigonometric functions is dependent, in the secondary school exposition at
least, on drawn or imagined triangles and on assumptions about the ratios of the
lengths of sides of similar right triangles. Secondary school level
trigonometry, and the trigonometry met in the typical first course on calculus,
are not derived purely from assumptions (or axioms) about real numbers (the
decimals say). There are additional assumptions that points, lines, circles and
triangles we locate or draw, can all be represented in analytic geometry. These
assumptions represent correspondences that need to be acknowledged.
Algebraic Codification
The operational command of mathematics provided by the first three phases
just described may be sufficient for students of art, engineering, science and
technology in their further studies of mathematics, if any, and other subjects.
Comprehension of mathematics may initially stem from an exposition of informal
or mixed chains of reason along with a cultivated and growing appreciation for
rigour. The first three phases have the aim of illustrating and giving a command
of arithmetic, counting, algebraic thought and deductive logic through a vast
number of examples. Such examples may also provide the mathematical maturity for
the fourth phase: understanding rigorous derivations of modern mathematics from
axioms about real numbers and sets, if not geometric objects.
The logical (thought-based) codification of mathematical ideas and results
within a set theoretic foundation is a technical endeavour. But the endeavour
provides a single framework for the discussion and rule-based development of the
arithmetic-oriented parts of pure and applied mathematics. Analytic geometry is
included in this development by means of arithmetic based coordinates. The
endeavour follows many long chains of reasoning from basic assumptions about
sets to the set-theoretic (decimal-free) representation of real numbers. Further
chains of reasoning yield complex numbers, analytic geometry, trigonometry and
calculus from the real numbers, all in a diagram-free fashion. Diagrams can be
employed to illustrate concepts or communicate ideas. While conclusions from
physical concepts cannot be employed to obtain results in the codification, they
do offer motivation.
Within the codification, geometric and physical concepts can be modeled. This
requires some further assumptions of a physical nature to establish a
correspondence within the analytic framework provided by the codification and
reality. Such correspondences are present in the geometric illustrations of the
codification (and even in its algebraic expression). Whatever is being
illustrated is being modeled within the codification via some correspondence.
The codification represents a mathematical universe, but there is more to
mathematics than this. There are the correspondences that we assume in linking
the codification with illustration or applications. Beyond this, there are the
practical and sometimes uncodified algebra of the applied sciences. The rigorous
communication of mathematics describes not only the codification but also
acknowledges the extra correspondences – those needed to relate the
symbolically or algebraically described concepts to geometric or physical
interpretations.
The fourth phase is not for all. It should not be emphasized before students
have an appreciation of deductive reason. It should not and cannot be emphasized
before the completion of first courses in trigonometry and calculus that mix the
assumptions made in both algebra and geometry – a reliance on diagrams.
More than one line of thought may be followed in math instruction. The first
line of say the first three phases aims to extend the common knowledge of
mathematics through the informal description of ideas and methods with
repeatable and reproducible results and through the offering of short and longer
chains of reason. The second and further lines of thought in the fourth phase,
college level, could be the more and more deductive and rigorous derivation of
mathematical results from axioms about real numbers or sets. Deductive strands
of reason presented earlier could be linked together.
With the axioms about real numbers, for the benefit of those not majoring or
specializing in mathematics, the explicit assumption that an infinite decimal
expansion defines a real number should be included. An initial emphasis on the
first three phases may allow more students and people to appreciate mathematics
and logic in general and possibly the fourth phase, the modern or present-day
axiomatic organization of mathematics, than linear and more direct exposition of
the latter. That is the hope, thesis and conclusion. Criticism and refinement
are welcome.

[1] Note bureaucratic methods, well designed or not, may also
lead to repeatable, reproducible and thus verifiable results, the optimality of
which can be questioned. So repeatable, reproducible and verifiable results are
not always desirable.
[2] Given the non-uniform comprehension of students
graduating from diverse high school programs, instruction at the college level
mathematics in North America simply hopes for a mastery of some logic and the
algebraic way of writing and thinking. The latter may or may not follow from
immersion in calculus.
[3] Arithmetic may fall in this category. In previous
centuries mastery of arithmetic is regarded as a sign of intelligence. Now the
mastery is common place.
| |
www.whyslopes.com
Volume 1B, Mathematics Curriculum Notes,
Foreword + Chapters 1 to 10 + 12
Book Entrance Inductive Principles 1 Introduction 2 For & Against Math 3 Algebraic Thought 4 Why Slopes & SQRT of -1 5 Books & Articles to Read 6 Unruly Origins of Algebra 6. Axiomatic Civilization 7 Geometry, 2 Ways 8 Modern Instruction 9 The Two Ends 10 The Transition 10 Explaining Logic 10 Explaining Algebra 10 Why Sets in Math. 12 Four Phases Links
Chapter 11: Primary School Mathematics
11 Primary Math 11 Cue Cards 11 Counting 11 Decimals - Addition 11 Decimals -Times 11 Decimals & Subtraction 11 Fractions and Division 11 Notational Conflict 11 Reciprocals Etc 11 Decimals - Ratios 11 Size Comparison 11 Numbers, +ve or -ve 11 Rename < Sign 11 Complex Numbers
Will provide an alternative to Chapter 11 later, most likely in the Parent's
Area: Help Your Child or Teen
Learn
Most students in high school are not heading for calculus,
but most topics in high school mathematics are present due to calculus.
Preparation for calculus demands their coverage at full strength.
See too, this site 55+, Math
Education Essays. Site areas and pages provide pieces of the a Mathematics
Education, Jigsaw Puzzle, in formation.
-Inductive
principles for course design & delivery require a clear
description of where and how skills and concepts may rest on earlier ones, so
that difficulties may be explained and remedied by looking for what was
missed or forgotten in earlier studies.
Mathematics is a demanding subject. All errors in notation
and comprehension need to be identified and corrected. In
reading, spelling and writing, students have to learn all the letters in the
alphabet, not just some. and memorize spelling. Anything less implies
difficulty.
Likewise in mathematics, students have to master key skills
and concepts, one at a time and one after another. Anything less implies
difficulty.
Modern mathematics curricula introduced an inconsistency
into course design and delivery. They did not sanction the use of decimals nor
the use of diagrams in skill and concept development but decimal arithmetic
and diagrams are needed for student comprehension and for an operational
mastery of quantitative skills. That implies the need for an mixed-math
curricula based on a systematic development of operational skills, sufficient
for applications and sufficient to provide a base & context
for the very optional study of pure mathematis.
|