Solutions for Arithmetic Review Problems
Volume 2, Three Skills for Algebra
Font Issues: Please view with internet explorer.
2.1 Basic Stuff
Perform the indicated calculations by hand. Then check your calculations
with the aid of a calculator.
- 456+76+312 = 844
- 176·86 = 15136
- 4892-2396 = 2496. Check: 2496+2396 = 4892
- 1416¸813 = 1.742 to 3 decimal places after
the decimal point.
- 2396-4892 = -(4892-2396) = -(2496) = -2496
2.2 More Basic Stuff
Simplify if possible. Remember that operations inside parentheses ( ) or
brackets [ ] are to be done first.
|
A = (4 ¸5)¸3 =
|
é
ê
ë
|
4
5
|
ù
ú
û
|
×
|
é
ê
ë
|
1
3
|
ù
ú
û
|
=
|
4
15
|
|
|
|
B = 4 ¸
|
|
5
3
|
= 4×
|
é
ê
ë
|
3
5
|
ù
ú
û
|
=
|
|
12
5
|
= 2.4
|
|
|
C = 4 ×(5 ×3) = 4 ×(15) = 60
|
|
|
D = (4 ×5) ×3 = (20) ×3 = 60
|
|
|
E = (4 - 5) - 3 = (-1)-3 = -4
|
|
|
F = 4 - (5 - 3) = 4-(2) = 2
|
|
|
G = 4 - 5 -3 = 4-(5+3) =
4-8 = -4
|
|
|
H =
|
|
__
Ö32
|
= 3 = the principal square root.
|
|
Here 32 = 3 ×3. The other square root of 9 is -3. This question is perhaps ambiguous - oops, unless you
we follow the convention that the phrase square root" here means the
principal square root. We will follow this convention below.
|
I =
|
|
____
Ö(-3)2
|
__
= Ö9
|
=
|
___
Ö(32)
|
= 3
|
|
in accordance with the convention that the square root of a positive
number is always taken to be its principal square root. The answer
-3 is not acceptable according to this
principal square root convention. The number -3 is the other square root.
K =
|
|
______
Ö
(42+32)
|
=
|
|
____
Ö16 +9
|
=
|
|
___
Ö (25)
|
= 5
|
|
L =
|
|
_________
Ö (42 +
(-3)2)
|
=
|
|
__
Ö 25
|
= 5
|
|
Division by a fraction p/q gives the same result as multiplication
by its reciprocal q/p.
Therefore
|
|
|
|
|
5
4
|
¸
|
é
ê
ë
|
8
7
|
¸
|
9
5
|
ù
ú
û
|
=
|
5
4
|
¸
|
é
ê
ë
|
8
7
|
×
|
5
9
|
ù
ú
û
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
5
4
|
) ¸
|
é
ê
ë
|
(8 ×5)
(7 ×9)
|
ù
ú
û
|
= (
|
5
4
|
) ×
|
é
ê
ë
|
( 7 ×9)
(8 ×5)
|
ù
ú
û
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
5
4
|
) ×
|
63
40
|
=
|
(5 ×63)
(4 ×40)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
( 4 ×8)
|
=
|
63
32
|
= 1 +
|
31
32
|
= 1.96875
|
|
|
exactly. Thus M > 1. Different ways of obtaining and
writing the answer are possible. All are permissible provided you knew the
justification or rule applied in each step of your figuring or reasoning
steps.
The numbers appearing in the calculation of M are identical to
those appearing in the calculation of
|
|
|
|
é
ê
ë
|
5
4
|
¸
|
8
7
|
ù
ú
û
|
¸
|
é
ê
ë
|
9
5
|
ù
ú
û
|
= [
|
é
ê
ë
|
5
4
|
×
|
7
8
|
ù
ú
û
|
×
|
é
ê
ë
|
5
9
|
ù
ú
û
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
32
|
×
|
5
9
|
=
|
35 ×5
32×9
|
=
|
175
288
|
=
|
175
288
|
< 1
|
|
|
But the order of division is different. This change in or grouping
of division operations changes the result. Here N ¹ M.
The number
|
|
|
|
5
4
|
×
|
é
ê
ë
|
7
8
|
×
|
9
5
|
ù
ú
û
|
=
|
5
4
|
×
|
7 ×9
8 ×5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 ×(7 ×9)
4 ×(8 ×5)
|
=
|
7 ×9
4 ×8
|
=
|
63
32
|
|
|
|
In handwriting, the letter O looks too much like the number
0. To avoid possible confusion with the number zero 0, the letter O
should NOT be used as a shorthand notation to represent a number.
The factors of the number O and the number
|
|
|
|
5 ×7
4 ×8
|
×
|
9
5
|
=
|
(5 ×7) ×9
(4 ×8)×5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 ×(7 ×9)
(4 ×8)×5
|
=
|
7 ×9
4 ×8
|
=
|
63
32
|
|
|
|
are identical, but the ordering and grouping of multiplication is
different. But for multiplication of fractions the ordering and grouping of
factors does not affect the result of a computation.
is not defined. The meaning of the expression
is not clear. Should it represent the calculation
|
é
ê
ë
|
5
4
|
¸
|
7
8
|
ù
ú
û
|
¸
|
9
5
|
or
|
5
4
|
¸
|
é
ê
ë
|
7
8
|
¸
|
9
5
|
ù
ú
û
|
?
|
|
Each of these expressions has a different value.
R =
|
|
__
Ö16
|
__
+ Ö9 -
|
|
__
Ö25
|
= 4+3 - 5 = 2
|
|
|
T = 3.1416 -
|
22
7
|
= 3.1416 - 3.142857143 = 0.001257143
(approx.)
|
|
Surprise perhaps, this answer T is nonzero as both 3.1416
and [22/7] are different approximations to the same number p.
U = p- 3.1416 ¹ 0 as p is not exactly
3.1416 A better approximation to p is
3.141592654 but the latter is still not exact. The decimal expansion of
p is infinite and non-repeating as the number
p is not rational - why is a intellectual debt
left to a higher mathematics course, if any. Here not rational means
p is not a number of the form
[(p)/(q)] where both p and q are whole
numbers.
|
V =
|
|
_____
Ö42-52
|
=
|
|
______
Ö( 16-25)
|
=
|
|
___
Ö(-9)
|
|
|
This square root is not defined. The expression for V is
another example of our ability to describe calculations that might be done
or not, might be impossible to complete. The calculation of V
becomes possible if you know about Ö[(-1)] and the complex numbers.
2.3 Calculator Button Exercises
-
A = sin(90°) = 1
-
B = sin(180°) = 0
-
C = sin(0°) = 0
-
D = sin(270°) =
-1
-
E = sin(-90°) = 0
-
F = sin(-720°) = 0
-
G = cos(90°) = 0
-
H = cos(180°) =
-1
-
I = cos(360°) = 1
-
J = cos(0°) = 1
-
K = cos(-90°) = 0
-
L = cos(-720°) = 1
Put your calculator in radian mode. Now find or compute:
-
a = sin([(p)/2] radians) = 1
-
b = sin(p radians) = 0
-
c = sin(0 radians) = 0
-
d = sin([3/2]p radians) = -1
-
e = sin(-[1/2]p radians) = -1
-
f = sin(-4p radians) = 0
-
g = cos([1/2]p radians) = 0
-
f = cos(p radians) = -1
-
h = cos(2p radians) = 1
-
i = cos(1.5p radians) = 0
-
j = cos(-[1/2]p radians) = 0
-
k = cos(-4p radians) = 1
2.4 More Calculator Button Work
Compute or find the following quantities:
-
A = exp( 2 ln(5)) = 25
-
B = e2 ln(5) = 52 = 25
-
C = 10 2 log(5) = 25
-
D = 10log(25) = 25
-
E = ln(exp(6.2)) = 6.2
-
F = ln( e6.2) = 6.2
-
G = the sixth root of (16)12 = (16)2 = 256
-
H = [(16)12][1/6] = (16)2 = 256
-
I =
1+3+32+33+34+35+37
= 2551
-
J = [(-1+37)/([-1+3])] = 1094
-
K = [([1-37])/([1-3])] =
1094
-
M = 1+(1.06)+(1.06)2+(1.06)3 = 4.374616
-
N = [([-1+(1.06)4])/([-1+1.06])] = 4.374616
-
P = [([(1.06)4-1])/([1.06-1])] = 4.374616
-
Q = [([-1+(1.06)4])/[0.06]] = 4.374616
-
R =
[1+(1.02)1+(1.02)2+(1.02)3+(1.02)4]×(1.02)(-4)
= 4.480773
-
S = [([(1.02)(5)-1])/([1.02-1])]
×(1.02)(-4) = 4.4416
-
T = 1+(1.02)(-1)+(1.02)(-2)+(1.02)(-3)+(1.02)(-4) = 4.4416
-
U = (1.02)(-4)+(1.02)(-3)+(1.02)(-2)+(1.02)(-1)+1 = 4.4416
2.5 More Arithmetic Examples
|
A = [(
|
4
5
|
) /(
|
24
35
|
)] /(
|
2
7
|
) = [(
|
4
5
|
) ×(
|
35
24
|
)] ×(
|
7
2
|
) = [
|
7
6
|
] ×(
|
7
2
|
) =
|
49
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
4
5
|
) /[(
|
24
35
|
) ×(
|
7
2
|
)] = (
|
4
5
|
) /[
|
(24 ×7)
(35 ×2)
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
4
5
|
) ×[
|
35 ×2)
(24 ×7)
|
] = (
|
4
5
|
) ×[
|
35
(12 ×7)
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 ×35
(5 ×(12 ×7)
|
=
|
4
12
|
=
|
1
3
|
|
|
|
This result is not equal to [49/12].
The expression
|
(
|
4
5
|
) /(
|
24
35
|
)/(
|
2
7
|
)
|
is undefined. No standard convention gives the order of division
but the order of division matters. See the previous two examples.
2.6 A Summation Shortcut
For the first task, S =
1+23+33+43 = 1+8+27+64 = 100. For the
second task
|
a = [(
|
1
2
|
)4(4+1)]2 = [(
|
1
2
|
)4(5)]2 = [10]2 = 100
|
|
- the sum of the cubes of the integers 1 to 5 equals
|
S(5) = [
|
1
2
|
5(6)]2 = 152 = 225
|
|
- the sum of the cubes of the integers 1 to 15 equals
|
S(15) = [(
|
1
2
|
)15(16)]2 = [15(8)]2 =
[120]2 = 14400
|
|
- the sum of the cubes of the integers 1 to 30 equals
|
S(30) = [(
|
1
2
|
)30(31)]2 = [15(31)]2 =
[465]2 = 216225
|
|
In the last calculation, use of the formula
requires less arithmetic work than directly adding the 30 cubes.
2.7 Algebraic Exercises
Some may be harder than the previous ones. If the algebraic exercises are
not understandable, try them later.
-
- The rational expression (ratio of two polynomials)
[(1+x+x2+x3)/(x-1)]
can not be simplified further.
- Factor x2+5x+6 Answer: Pairs of
factors of 6 are
|
6 and 1
|
-6 and -1
|
2 and 3
|
-2 and -3.
|
Observe the sum of 2 and 3 is five. Recall
(x+a)(x+b) =
x2+(a+b)x+ab
But from this pattern,
(x+2)(x+3) = x2+(2+3)x+(2)(3)
= x2+5x+6
So x2+5x+6 equals the product
(x+2)(x+3). Factorization is done.
- The product (x-1)(2x+4)(3-x) =
0 when and only when at least one of the factors is zero.
- The first factor x-1 = 0 when
and only when x = 1.
- The second factor 2x+4 = 0 when and only when 2x =
-4 or x = -2.
- The third factor 3-x = 0 when
and only when x = 3.
Thus (x-1)(2x+4)(3-x)
= 0 forces x to have the value 1, -2 or 3. To see each possible value is a solution,
observe that x = 1, -2 or 3 implies
one of the factors is zero and thus their product
(x-1)(2x+4)(3-x) = 0.
-
x3-x = x
(x2 -1) =
x(x-1)(x+1) factored.
- Now
(x+1)(x+3x2)-[(x+1)x+(x+1)3x2)]
= [(x+1)(x+3x2)-(x+1)[x+3x2)] = 0
simplified.
- 132-52-(13+5)(13-5) = 0 simplified.
- Here
|
7 -
|
|
______
Ö(32+42)
|
= 7 -
|
|
_____
Ö(9+16)
|
= 7 -
|
|
__
Ö25
|
= 7-5 = 2
|
simplified.
- Here
|
æ
ç
è
|
3
7
|
ö
÷
ø
|
13
|
×
|
æ
ç
è
|
|
(4x2)
(32 ×73)
|
ö
÷
ø
|
5
|
|
|
=
|
313
713
|
×
|
45x10
310 ×715
|
=
|
313 ×45 ×x10
713 ×310×715
|
|
=
|
313-10 ×45
×x10
713+15
|
=
|
33 45 x10
728
|
Note parenthesis and grouping in products do not affect the result of
their computation. So they can be put in and pulled out of products at
convenience. This can be justified via deductive chains of reasons
depending on two properties of multiplication - the associative law and
the commutative law.
- Here
(9x2+3)(4+4x+4x2)][(x-1)(2x+2)-2x2+2)]
=
[(9x2+3)(4+4x+4x2)][(x2-1)2-2x2+2)]
=
[(9x2+3)(4+4x+4x2)][0]
= 0
regardless of what value is used for x. This
suggests that when the value of the original expression is requested,
no computation is needed. The value will be zero. Of course, some
computation would be needed if the simplification had not been
done.
- Here
gives
|
f(4) =
|
|
_____
Ö25-42
|
=
|
|
_____
Ö25
|
_
= Ö9 = 3
|
|
- We are given x+y = p and
y-x = 1. Observe by substitution,
that is, replacement, that
Therefore 2y = p+1 and so
y = [(p+1)/2]. Now
y-x = 1 yields y =
1+x and hence y-1 = x.
Therefore,
|
x = y - 1 =
|
p+1
2
|
- 1 =
|
p+1 -2
2
|
=
|
p-1
2
|
|
|
Thus in conclusion
|
(x,y) = (
|
p-1
2
|
,
|
p+1
2
|
)
|
|
- Here
|
|
|
|
[2×32×y3z(-3)t3)(-2)]
×[33x4y(-5)]2
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2(-2)
×3(-4)×y(-6)z6t(-6)]
×[36x8y(-10)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
2(-2)3(-4+6) y(-6)z6t(-6)]x8y(-10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expressed with positive powers only (at the cost of introducing
some division).
- The equation (x-10)(x-3)=0 has two solutions namely x = 10 and
x = 3 but only one satisfies the requirement x > 4,
namely x = 10. So x = 10 is the answer. The other solution
x = 3 is extra (or extraneous) due to this requirement or request
that x > 4. If the latter requirement is replaced by the
requirement x > 12, the equation (x-10)(x-3) = will have
no solutions satisfying this new requirement. With each of the other
requirements x > 2 and x > -99, we have two acceptable solutions, namely +3 and +10,
which satisfy both of these requirements.
- The equation 4 = [1/(x+1)] holds when and only when
4(x+1) = 1, or x+1 = [1/4]. The latter holds when and
only when x = ([1/4])-1 or x =
-[3/4]. This solution can be verified or
checked as follows: [1/(((-[3/4]+1))] =
[1/(([1/4]))] = 1 ¸[1/4] = 1 ×[4/1] = 4
- From z = 2x+3, t = 32,
w-t = 10 and x =
4t+1 and y = y2, different substitutions
and replacements lead to different ways to find and compute the number
z.
- First Way: t = 32 gives x = 4t+1
= 4(32)+1 and thus z = 2x+3 =
2(4(32)+1)+3 Thus z = 2(4(9)+1)+3 = 2(36+1)+3 =
2(37)+3 = 74+3 = 77
- Second Way: z = 2x+3 = 2(4t+1)+3 =
2(4(32)+1)+3 = 2(4·9+1) + 3 =
(37)+3 = 74+3 = 77 as before.
Third Way: z = 2x+3 = 2(4t+1)+3 =
8t+2+3 = 8t+5 = 8×9+5 = 72+5 = 77
Each way is shown here to show you that a problem can be solved via
slightly different reasoning paths.
|
|
Teachers & Tutors: Site pages offer better or best practices for providing skills -
simpler than expected & comprehensive but for exercises. For your charges, your duty is to study them alone or in
groups and develop skill building exercises & activities to share. Start now. The effort here is the best I can do.
Others are welcome to refine or exceed it. Please do.
Secondary
Mathematics for Ages 11+, A Practical Approach for home-tutoring or -schooling, or for schools & colleges
with local curriculum control. Study how to include site content - its skill development how-TOs and innovations
into present or future lesson plans - some reading required.
Road
Safety Messages and Questions: When and why should you face
traffic when walking along a road or cycle path? Is it a good
idea to hang limbs outside of cars etc? What gives more
protection in a crash: a car, motorbike or bicycle?
See too, the BBC-Belgium story Texting and
Driving - texting & the impossible test - the article links to a gruesome utube video on the subject
The Logic of Injustice:
How Texas sent
an innocent man to his death - The wrong Carlos. Some judgments are irreversible. Procescution: Where and when prosectors play to win rather than for
justice, guilt beyond a reasonable doubt goes unrespected due to prosecutors who putting winning
first, those innocence before the law may be convicted. Some procescutors offices in continuing to accuse after a pardon
due to reasonable doubt or innocent being shown, may sucessfully oppose compensaton for false convictions
by asserting a pardon individual is still under suspicion. Then the pardoned individual or the latter's estate
is not compensation for years or decade
of improper or false imprisonment, or for execution. Site chapters on Logic
and some in Pattern
Based Reason may slowly lead to greater precision in reading, applying and
writing laws.
May 2012, Composition Starting:
Pre-School and Primary Mathematics - Quantitative Skills, An
Intellectual View, Feedback Welcome:
The 8 Most Popular Site Inlinks
Parent Center: Help your child or teen
learn:
Parent-friendly
Work Booklets for ages 3+ to 13 Use these or others to check
or build skills. Other booklets are available but these booklets
allow parents unsure of themselves in mathematics to help their
children. The selection acquired in Canada is published in the
USA. So it has a US orientation. In retrospect, the selection
shows parents what to check with the booklets or by other ways,
the choice is theirs. But in retrospect, the selection does not
cover integral and fractions liquid weights and measures - ask
the publishers to correct that! For ages 9 to 12 say, parents may
compensate by showing boys and girls how to use weights or mass,
and further measures in food preparation. Beyond that children
may be shown how to measure and calculate angles, lengths and
areas [proportional amounts too] directly or by using maps and
plans drawns to scale. Learning how to gather and measure all the
ingredients, pots and pans for a dish or a meal, along with
cleaning up sets the stage for like activities or experiments in
science courses, and in developing organizational skills,
gives boys and girls a head start. Good luck. At the other
extreme, more comprehensive than light, if your motto is
McCainian: drill, drill, drill then Toronto
mathematician and actor John Mighton's jump math organization has jump math
workbooks for at least grades 3 to 8 for at-home and in-school
use - training sessions for teachers available. Jump math has
been expanding to cover older students. Jump Math Samples: plus
Fractions for
Grades 3-4 & Grades 5-6 [Read] Free Resources grades 1 to 8
[unread - likely to be good]. and
Mathematics
Skills For Ages 3 to 14 - technical!
Skills with take
home value - A few ideas
Basic skills include
time-date-calendar Matters; money matters; map, plan and
scale diagram matters;counting, measuring and figuring;
decision making with logic and likelyhood; being careful and
being aware of the domino effect of mistakes; reading and
writing with precision.
Is your child able to add, subtract and multiply amounts
of money, work with fractions, work with clocks and calendars,
work with maps and plans, and measure length, weight-mass and
volume? Schools may promote your son or daughter without
providing basic skills in reading, writing and
arithmetic.
Arithmetic
and Number Theory Skills
Algebra
Starter Lessons
Geometry
- maps plans trigonometry vectors
More
Algebra
70
Calculus Starter Lessons
Calculus Lessons Elsewhere:
-
How to Ace Calculus: Street Wise Guide - Mostly
Text.
-
Flash
Video for Calculus Phobics
They cover basic topics in ways likely to complement your
notes, your textbooks and site material. When Goldilocks
trespassed in the house of the three bears, she found three bowls
of porridge, two not to her liking, and one just right. Different
bears have different tastes. As invited guest here and elsewhere,
if one or more explanations is not to liking, try another. It may
be better or just right.
Unsolicited Advice
Learning to do and high marks if it comes to easy is often
deceptive - light rather than deep. For that reason, students
with learning difficulties determined not to let it get in their
way may go deeper and farther than those with none. High marks,
if the come easy, may be deceptive - provide a too light and not
a deep mastery. That could have been your problem in secondary
school, one that leads to comprehension shock or difficulties in
calculus and more generally in the first year of college. Bon
Appetite.
|
|