Similarity of Triangles
Similarity theory for triangles is sufficient for high school level
trigonometry.
|
Similarity theory in Euclidean geometry may
say when two polygonal figures have the same shape. The latter
codifies the notion of two planar regions or curves in plane
having the same shape, incompletely as only polygonal curves and
regions are considered, but that is good enough for the further
needs of high school mathematics. The further study of
trigonometry with triangles is based on the similarity of right
triangles. That being said, similarity theory for triangles would
be sufficient for high school mathematics - see trigonometry. Two
planar polygonal figures (triangles) are similar when and only
when (i) corresponding angles are equal (have the same measure)
and (ii) corresponding sides are proportional. Trigonometry on or
with the unit circle provide another face of the further study of
trigonometry.
Similarity theory for maps and plans with
coordinates (analytic geometry) may take a more general
viewpoint: That is, two figures in the plane are similar when and
only when after a change of scale if need-be, they have or
correspond to the same set of coordinates. This analytic
viewpoint is needed to understand or codify our ability to
recognize letters and objects which have the same shape or nearly
the same shape but different sizes in reading and writing letters
and symbols, and in recognizing objects drawn on paper or as they
exist in real life (space).
In the foregoing, size but not shape varies as
we move to or away from the letters or object. Size thus
depends on distance. The geometric theory of optics says or
suggest how.
|
Two planar polygonal figures (triangles) are similar
when and only when (i) corresponding angles are equal (have the same
measure) and (ii) corresponding sides are proportional. Trigonometry on
or with the unit circle provide another face of the further study of
trigonometry. To learn more about similarity, visit Maps,
Plans, Similarity & Trig, (alt view)
Two triangles ABC and DEF
are said to be similar with respect to a correspondence when and only
when both of the following conditions are satisfied
- The ratios of lengths of corresponding sides are all equal. That
is
- Corresponding angles are equal.
The shorthand notation. ABC DEF means the two triangle are (or should be) similar.
The empirical pattern that appear after drawing and measuring many
triangles suggests the following:
Assumption: The conditions (1) and (2) are equivalent. That is,
if one of them holds, so must the other.
Therefore in order to decide whether or not two triangles are similar, we
only have to check whether or not (1) ratios of corresponding sides are
equal; or (2) corresponding angles are equal. Checking only one of the
two conditions leads to minimal conditions for similarity.
Minimal Condition AA. The proof (given later)
that the sum of angles in a triangle is two right angles (180 degrees)
implies that if a pair of angles in one triangle coincide with a pair
of angles in a second triangle, then the third angles are equal too.
Hence there is a correspondence in which matching (that is
corresponding) angles are equal. (The proof that three angles in a
triangle sum to 180 degrees depends on the properties of parallel
lines.)
Remark 1. For two triangles to be similar, the
longest sides and angles must be paired, the smallest sides and
smallest angles must be paired, and the other sides and angles must be
paired. Pairing here is by the correspondence of the triangles or their
vertices.
Remark 2. For clarity, when ABC is part of a larger
figure, or when the angle at vertex A is not unique, we may write
CAB in
place of A
Proportionality and Proportionality Constants.
Suppose the triangles ABC and DEF
are similar. Let K be the common value of the ratios or fractions
The sides of the first triangle ABC (lengths in the numerator or on top) are
proportional to the sides of the second triangle DEF (lengths in denominators
or on bottoms) are proportional to the sides
(3) a = Kd, b= Ke and c = Kf
with the common value K as the a proportionality constant. On the other
hand (conversely) if equation (3) holds for some constant K, then
condition (1) holds.
Proof:
a
d
|
= K
|
and
|
b
e
|
= K
|
and
|
c
f
|
= K
|
Therefore
as all are = K
In a typical application of the equations (3), the length of two sides,
say a and d serves to find the value of the proportionality constant K.
Then as K becomes known, each of the equations b= Ke and c = Kf can be
used to find missing lengths when at least one of the lengths in them is
known.
The proof of depends on what has been done so far and properties of
parallel lines. Another proof follows from the cosine law in
coordinate view of trigonometry.
|
Assumption: The Side-Side-Side Minimal Condition for
Similarity.
If there is a matching such that corresponding sides in a pair
of triangles are proportional, then the triangles are similar.
|
|
The SAS (minimal) condition for similarity assumes if a
pair of matching sides in a pair of triangles have proportional
lengths and their included angles are equal then the pair of
triangles are similar:
|
Remark 3. Let K-1 = 1/K be the reciprocal or
multiplicative inverse of K. The the proportionality condition (3) is
equivalent to proportionality condition
(4) d = (K-1)a, e =(K-1)b and f =
(K-1)c
Here the proportionality constant is replaced by its reciprocal
K-1 = 1/K when we go from the second triangle to the first.
Remark 4. Any of two of the three equalities
are enough to imply
|
a
d
|
=
|
b
e
|
=
|
c
f
|
=
|
a
|
common
|
value
|
K
|
and hence the similarity of triangles. The case of right triangles leads
to trigonometry.
End Note 1: Scale Factors
for maps and diagrams (and between them)
For triangles (and more generally polygons) in the plane drawn to scale K
in maps and diagrams, the scale factor K (for instance 1: 100) provides
the proportionality constant. Lengths in the drawing are K times
corresponding lengths in the original. Moreover, a topic for later study,
areas in the drawing are K2 times those in the original.
Remark 5, A Chain Rule. Suppose we have three drawings, a first, a
second and a third, so that lengths in the third are K32 times
those in the second, and lengths in the second are K21 times
those in the first. Then we may conclude that lengths in the third are
K31 = (K32 )(K21 ) times those in the
first.
Note according to this author. the "chain rule" for proportionality
relations y = a x and z = b y is z = (ba) x. The
multiplication of proportionality constants with chains may be
associated with models of pulley systems based on ropes or chains, or
bicycle gears systems, in which gear or pulley ratios serve as
proportionality constants, and coupling of pulley or gears leads to
their multiplication. Question: Does this association imply the correct
historical origin of the phrase "chain rule"?
|
|
Teachers & Tutors: Site pages offer better or best practices for providing skills -
simpler than expected & comprehensive but for exercises. For your charges, your duty is to study them alone or in
groups and develop skill building exercises & activities to share. Start now. The effort here is the best I can do.
Others are welcome to refine or exceed it. Please do.
Secondary
Mathematics for Ages 11+, A Practical Approach for home-tutoring or -schooling, or for schools & colleges
with local curriculum control. Study how to include site content - its skill development how-TOs and innovations
into present or future lesson plans - some reading required.
Road
Safety Messages and Questions: When and why should you face
traffic when walking along a road or cycle path? Is it a good
idea to hang limbs outside of cars etc? What gives more
protection in a crash: a car, motorbike or bicycle?
See too, the BBC-Belgium story Texting and
Driving - texting & the impossible test - the article links to a gruesome utube video on the subject
The Logic of Injustice:
How Texas sent
an innocent man to his death - The wrong Carlos. Some judgments are irreversible. Procescution: Where and when prosectors play to win rather than for
justice, guilt beyond a reasonable doubt goes unrespected due to prosecutors who putting winning
first, those innocence before the law may be convicted. Some procescutors offices in continuing to accuse after a pardon
due to reasonable doubt or innocent being shown, may sucessfully oppose compensaton for false convictions
by asserting a pardon individual is still under suspicion. Then the pardoned individual or the latter's estate
is not compensation for years or decade
of improper or false imprisonment, or for execution. Site chapters on Logic
and some in Pattern
Based Reason may slowly lead to greater precision in reading, applying and
writing laws.
May 2012, Composition Starting:
Pre-School and Primary Mathematics - Quantitative Skills, An
Intellectual View, Feedback Welcome:
The 8 Most Popular Site Inlinks
Parent Center: Help your child or teen
learn:
Parent-friendly
Work Booklets for ages 3+ to 13 Use these or others to check
or build skills. Other booklets are available but these booklets
allow parents unsure of themselves in mathematics to help their
children. The selection acquired in Canada is published in the
USA. So it has a US orientation. In retrospect, the selection
shows parents what to check with the booklets or by other ways,
the choice is theirs. But in retrospect, the selection does not
cover integral and fractions liquid weights and measures - ask
the publishers to correct that! For ages 9 to 12 say, parents may
compensate by showing boys and girls how to use weights or mass,
and further measures in food preparation. Beyond that children
may be shown how to measure and calculate angles, lengths and
areas [proportional amounts too] directly or by using maps and
plans drawns to scale. Learning how to gather and measure all the
ingredients, pots and pans for a dish or a meal, along with
cleaning up sets the stage for like activities or experiments in
science courses, and in developing organizational skills,
gives boys and girls a head start. Good luck. At the other
extreme, more comprehensive than light, if your motto is
McCainian: drill, drill, drill then Toronto
mathematician and actor John Mighton's jump math organization has jump math
workbooks for at least grades 3 to 8 for at-home and in-school
use - training sessions for teachers available. Jump math has
been expanding to cover older students. Jump Math Samples: plus
Fractions for
Grades 3-4 & Grades 5-6 [Read] Free Resources grades 1 to 8
[unread - likely to be good]. and
Mathematics
Skills For Ages 3 to 14 - technical!
Skills with take
home value - A few ideas
Basic skills include
time-date-calendar Matters; money matters; map, plan and
scale diagram matters;counting, measuring and figuring;
decision making with logic and likelyhood; being careful and
being aware of the domino effect of mistakes; reading and
writing with precision.
Is your child able to add, subtract and multiply amounts
of money, work with fractions, work with clocks and calendars,
work with maps and plans, and measure length, weight-mass and
volume? Schools may promote your son or daughter without
providing basic skills in reading, writing and
arithmetic.
Arithmetic
and Number Theory Skills
Algebra
Starter Lessons
Geometry
- maps plans trigonometry vectors
More
Algebra
70
Calculus Starter Lessons
Calculus Lessons Elsewhere:
-
How to Ace Calculus: Street Wise Guide - Mostly
Text.
-
Flash
Video for Calculus Phobics
They cover basic topics in ways likely to complement your
notes, your textbooks and site material. When Goldilocks
trespassed in the house of the three bears, she found three bowls
of porridge, two not to her liking, and one just right. Different
bears have different tastes. As invited guest here and elsewhere,
if one or more explanations is not to liking, try another. It may
be better or just right.
Unsolicited Advice
Learning to do and high marks if it comes to easy is often
deceptive - light rather than deep. For that reason, students
with learning difficulties determined not to let it get in their
way may go deeper and farther than those with none. High marks,
if the come easy, may be deceptive - provide a too light and not
a deep mastery. That could have been your problem in secondary
school, one that leads to comprehension shock or difficulties in
calculus and more generally in the first year of college. Bon
Appetite.
|
|